Ban on Candidate Contribution Sticks
You will learn that from the recent cases, courts actually maintained a ban on businesses contributing unlimited funds to campaigns. You will realize that around 90% of Americans prefer having the role of money in politics to be put under control. This is what has made so many people to eagerly wait for the ruling so as to know what role the corporates will take in financing politics in future. The decision by the Supreme Court will certainly not be welcome for all. They chose not to consider removing the ban on campaign finance. As you go on reading, you will discover more about why this ruling was taken into account.
It is important for us to start with understanding that nothing new took place in the court. The Supreme Court just chose to go by what the previous ruling on the campaign finance laws was without considering its challenges. It is for this reason that then corporates will not have the room to contribute money to campaigns as well as candidates. It is through this decision that the role of corporates in the political arena is being tamed. In the previous ruling, you will learn that corporates were often allowed to contribute to the campaigns. This would often be allowed if the money is not tied to a particular individual. It is imperative to mention that this case was actually presented by two companies that hail from Massachusetts. This case was purposed to enhance financial responsibility and even economic opportunities. It is recommended for you to consider a good lawyer whenever presenting such a case.
It is also important for you to understand the legal argument behind this particular case. It is imperative to mention that these companies indicated that the first amendment rights of companies was not being considered. The argument was that political donations were actually part of freedom of speech. They also invoked the constitution which seeks to protect every individual equally. While at it, non-profit and even charity organizations are not allowed to donate to these campaigns. This goes ahead to show that the treatment offered right here tend to be discriminatory. This does conflict what the constitution basically stands for.
It is necessary to mention that the ruling of the High Court was upheld. This ruling claimed that corporates are not allowed to donate money to political campaigns. This is because it could easily lead to corruption in politics. As such, no political candidate will be allowed to receive any political donation from corporations.